Skip to content

Stock image sites don’t know what a think tank is. They’re not alone…

August 5, 2019 #Insights
Stock image sites don’t know what a think tank is. They’re not alone…
Back to Articles
The world of stock images is a curious place.

And famously so. One of the biggest memes of the past few years, ‘distracted boyfriend’, plays on the running joke of bad stock images.

No shade to stock photographers or providers. People buy these photos. Images are adopted as visual shortcuts and for that reason they frequently deal in stereotypes.

Stock images often represent our society’s crudest understanding (or lack thereof) of the world around us.

So, what does the stock image world think about think tanks?

I did a quick search of the main sites, and what I got was…

…a great big visual shrug.

There were some results though. These can be broadly categorised as follows.


“We know the words ‘think’ and ‘tank’ go together, but have no idea why. Someone, somewhere knows though. So, give the people what they want: a picture of these words.”

When you have no hope in hell in representing something visually, put it on a sign.


These images get a little closer. Think tanks are about thinking. And we all know thinking always involves some form of mind map.

A perfect visual representation of a think tank.


They’re talking, it’s serious, it’s important. But what’s it about? And what do they do with those clever, clever thoughts?

Stock image sites aren’t alone. These search results mirror the mental image many people have of think tanks.

Take some of the people we spoke to in Pittsburgh as part of some recent research.

We asked “When I say ‘think tank’ what’s the first thing you think of?”

Replies included:

“Hmm. I don’t know. I don’t have an answer for that. Nothing.”


“I don’t know. People thinking.”


“Kind of like ideas in your head and you can pull them out like a fish tank kind of.”

Think tank… fish tank… Look it was worth a shot.

Of those we polled who said they do know what a think tank is (though couldn’t name one), 34% said think tanks are ‘manipulative’ and 28% said they do backroom deals. The answers from the UK were pretty similar too. This should be as concerning to think tanks as obscurity and irrelevance.

I think I’d kind of miss all of those bad stock images if they went. But when it comes the disconnect between think tanks and the public? This is a problem that needs solving.

This piece originally appeared on Inkstick.

Image credit: William Felipe Seccon on Unsplash.

Read this if you can’t stop using jargon
Read this if you can’t stop using jargon
{Tom Jeffery}
I deleted my photos and I don’t care
I deleted my photos and I don’t care
{Oscar Park}
#1: The new model of policy influencing
#1: The new model of policy influencing
{Tom Hashemi}